|
Post by account_disabled on Mar 13, 2024 1:06:13 GMT -5
No matter how developed the technology is in a certain healthcare setting, the doctor's prior opinion, his or her intervention using the latest generation of technological instruments, and postoperative follow-up are essential for the patient, and cannot be replaced by a machine (no matter how advanced it is in process automation). This reflection is applicable, mutatis mutandis , to the DJ USA legal profession. No matter how advanced an application based on AI language is and no matter how developed the parameters are that allow the incalculable use of texts (ranging from translation to the generation of a text), the intervention of a lawyer or a A lawyer will always be essential, as a guarantor of effective judicial protection and as a guarantor of the defense of the rights of citizens. Empathy , as defined by the RAE, and which involves the feeling of identification with something or someone and the ability to identify with someone and share their feelings, is essential in the legal profession and cannot be replaced in any way by AI , nor can it be the opinion and expertise of the medical professional. The citizen and the defense of his or her rights will always need a lawyer whom they can consult about their specific case and about the best way to see their rights protected, whether in administrative or judicial proceedings, or through any means of alternative conflict resolution. Without a doubt, new technologies allow and will allow greater efficiency when implementing these rights, but, as in medicine (or in any other professional activity that requires presence such as psychology), the personal intervention of the representative of the legal profession with the client will always be essential.
|
|