Post by account_disabled on Mar 12, 2024 0:19:29 GMT -5
Likewise, the Provincial Court of Seville does not understand how it is possible that the appealed sentence concludes that it has not been proven that the accused ridiculed the minor in front of third parties, ordering him on one occasion to pick up a dog's excrement from the ground with his hand , when he recognizes in the same sentence that a neighbor states that one day he "ordered him to pick up shit from the floor" and that, when he did not obey him, he looked at him seriously and the boy was going to obey him if it had not been for the fact that he was detained, without giving an explanation why this statement does not give credibility.
For all the above and without reviewing or making further Email Data considerations about the assessment of this and the remaining personal evidence carried out in the lower court ruling, nor about the legal classification that the facts would deserve, the Court has ruled that the omission in the assessment of the evidence of the exposed witnesses and the contradictions revealed between the body of the motivation and the statement of proven facts, are sufficient to consider that their reasoning is erroneous because it is illogical and because it is deprived of sufficient rationality and congruence.
Consequently, the sentence handed down by the Criminal Court No. 15 of Seville has been annulled, returning the proceedings to the Court of origin for a new trial to be held, which must be carried out by a judge other than the one who held the trial in the first instance. .Downloading company documents to the personal cloud does not justify disciplinary dismissal
The Superior Court of Justice of Madrid ratifies the inadmissibility of the dismissal of a worker since it was not proven that he shared confidential information with a friend from the competition.
For all the above and without reviewing or making further Email Data considerations about the assessment of this and the remaining personal evidence carried out in the lower court ruling, nor about the legal classification that the facts would deserve, the Court has ruled that the omission in the assessment of the evidence of the exposed witnesses and the contradictions revealed between the body of the motivation and the statement of proven facts, are sufficient to consider that their reasoning is erroneous because it is illogical and because it is deprived of sufficient rationality and congruence.
Consequently, the sentence handed down by the Criminal Court No. 15 of Seville has been annulled, returning the proceedings to the Court of origin for a new trial to be held, which must be carried out by a judge other than the one who held the trial in the first instance. .Downloading company documents to the personal cloud does not justify disciplinary dismissal
The Superior Court of Justice of Madrid ratifies the inadmissibility of the dismissal of a worker since it was not proven that he shared confidential information with a friend from the competition.