Post by anik4200 on Feb 18, 2024 6:16:53 GMT -5
Statute, which provides for other situations of preservation of the profession", reports the OAB's national attorney for Prerogatives, Alex Sarkis. For the president of the National Commission for the Defense of Prerogatives and Valorization of the Law, Ricardo Breier, the prerogatives of the class are non-negotiable. "Just as is guaranteed to the judiciary and the Public Prosecutor's Office, for example, due to their function, the legal profession has the same right defined by law. The principle of equality applies here", he explains. Among the other guarantees of the statute is the presence of an OAB representative in cases of arrest in the act for issues relating to the exercise of the profession, under penalty of nullity.
The determination of imprisonment in the General Staff room was recognized by the Supreme Court in the Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADI) 1.127-8, judged in 2006 by the STF. Unanimously, the Supreme Court plenary voted for the thesis that "the State cannot protect certain people while being silent in rela Special Phone Number Data tion to the large number of people held in custody by the prison system." "Ensuring adequate and dignified conditions of incarceration is a state duty in relation to everyone, and not to a specific category of people." Based on this understanding, the STF declared unconstitutional article 295 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which establishes the right to special imprisonment for people with a higher education diploma.
The judgment was made in the virtual plenary between March 24th and 31st. The vote of the case rapporteur, Minister Alexandre de Moraes, won unanimously. The court analyzed an action by the Attorney General's Office. For the body, the special prison is a "privilege" that offends the principles of human dignity, equality and the fundamental objectives of the Republic.CriminalElectoralInternationalPolicy Former President of the United States Donald Trump, already a defendant, will have his first hearing before Judge Juan Merchan, in a Manhattan court, this Tuesday (4/4). Last Thursday (30/3), a grand jury in New York decided to indict him for violating electoral financing rules in the 2016 presidential campaign.
The determination of imprisonment in the General Staff room was recognized by the Supreme Court in the Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADI) 1.127-8, judged in 2006 by the STF. Unanimously, the Supreme Court plenary voted for the thesis that "the State cannot protect certain people while being silent in rela Special Phone Number Data tion to the large number of people held in custody by the prison system." "Ensuring adequate and dignified conditions of incarceration is a state duty in relation to everyone, and not to a specific category of people." Based on this understanding, the STF declared unconstitutional article 295 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which establishes the right to special imprisonment for people with a higher education diploma.
The judgment was made in the virtual plenary between March 24th and 31st. The vote of the case rapporteur, Minister Alexandre de Moraes, won unanimously. The court analyzed an action by the Attorney General's Office. For the body, the special prison is a "privilege" that offends the principles of human dignity, equality and the fundamental objectives of the Republic.CriminalElectoralInternationalPolicy Former President of the United States Donald Trump, already a defendant, will have his first hearing before Judge Juan Merchan, in a Manhattan court, this Tuesday (4/4). Last Thursday (30/3), a grand jury in New York decided to indict him for violating electoral financing rules in the 2016 presidential campaign.